EXPERIMENTAL APPLICATION OF A SPLIT-CONJUGATED VACCINE AGAINST ANIMAL BRUCELLOSIS IN SMALL CATTLE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28983/asj.v0i10.600Keywords:
brucellosis, split-conjugated vaccine against animal brucellosis, sheep, goats, agglutination test, Rose-Bengal probe, complement fixation reaction, anti-brucellosis antibody titresAbstract
A study was made of the blood samples of small cattle for brucellosis with various serological reactions when testing a split-conjugated vaccine against animal brucellosis three and a half, four and a half months and nine months after immunization. Positive reaction of small cattle to brucellosis in the complement fixation reaction and the agglutination reaction of 40.7% of sheep and goats, and 44.4% of animals in Ros-Bengal after 3.5 months of vaccination. The vaccine has a high immunogenicity against goats, a high enough antibody titer in blood three and a half months after vaccination, when tested with agglutination and Rose-Bengal, breakdown was detected in 83.3% of animals, and in the complement fixation reaction it was 66.7%, which will, in our opinion, effectively use this vaccine in the fight against goat brucellosis. Immunized sheep in the complement-fixation reaction and Rose-Bengal assay reacted positively only in 33.3% of cases. When the agglutination reaction was established three and a half months after the introduction of the vaccine - in 28.6% of the animals, in connection with the data obtained, we recommend looking for new immunoprotectors capable of enhancing the humoral immune response of sheep to the antigen of the tested anti-brucellosis vaccine. Nine months after the vaccination of the split-conjugated vaccine in all blood samples of small cattle (sheep and goats) with all of the above reactions, there was no positive test, which indicates the disappearance and complement-binding and agglutinating antibodies from the bloodstream of animals, and thus the opportunity is given differentiate postvaccinal antibodies in the blood serum of animals, from post-infection, in the case of their detection within the time specified above.
Downloads
References
2. Аракелян П.К., Димов С.К. Оптимизация мероприятий при бруцеллезе сельскохозяйственных животных в современных условиях // Ветеринария. – 2013. – № 4. – С. 23–26.
3. Веселовский С.Ю., Частов А.А., Агольцов В.А. Изучение реактогенных и иммуногенных свойств вакцины против бруцеллеза из штамма Brucella abortus КВ 17/100, с масляным адъювантом на крупном рогатом скоте и верблюдах // Научная жизнь. – 2016. – № 1. – С. 129–137.
4. Канатбаев С.Г., Тен В.Б., Нысанов Е.С. Использование иммуномодуляторов при бруцеллезе животных // Западно-Казахстанская науч.-исслед. вет. станция, ТОО «КазНИВИ» // Ветеринария сегодня. – 2013. – № 4. – С. 45–48.
5. Литвинов О.Б., Девришов Д.А., Янышев А.А. Бруцеллёз в России // Ветеринарная жизнь. – 2007. – № 2. – С.14.
6. Наставление по диагностике бруцеллеза животных от 29 сентября 2003 г. №13-5-02/0850 // Consultant.ru.
7. Попова Т.Г., Новицкий А.А., Колычев Н.М. Эпизоотологические и экологические аспекты специфической профилактики бруцеллеза // Ветеринария. – 2012. – № 2. – С. 24–26.
8. Экспериментальное применение сплит-коньюгированной вакцины против бруцеллеза животных на крупном рогатом скоте / С.В. Веселовский [и др.] // Аграрный научный журнал. – 2018. – № 6. – С. 3–6.
9. Luo D. Y. The DNA vaccine encoding L7 / L12-P39 Brucella abortus induces protective immunity in BALB / c mice // Chinese Medical Journal, 2006, Vol. 4, pp. 331–334.
10. Pikula J. Ecology of brucellosis of the European hare in the Czech Republic. / J. Pikula // Veterinary. Medicine. – Czech, 2005. Vol. 50. (3), P. 105–109.
